Ethical Issues in Psychological and Educational Testing

11 pages · 1,947 words

This APA research paper, written at Master’s level for a psychology course, examines the ethical issues in psychological and educational testing. It follows a test through administration, scoring and interpretation, names the errors examiners make most often at each stage and the APA ethical principles each stage engages, then turns to test bias and fairness and to the strengths and risks of computerized assessment, with steps psychologists can take to avoid ethics violations.

Psychological testing is the administration of psychological tests, each of which is meant to be an objective and standardized measure of a sample of behavior. A sample of behavior here means a person’s performance on tasks set in advance. This paper evaluates the ethical issues that accompany psychological testing (Domino & Domino, 2006).

Test Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation

Issues Related to Errors in Test Administration

Common Errors

A study of the protocols that graduate students completed on the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ III COG) found that the most frequent errors were incorrect ceilings, failure to record responses, and failure to circle the correct row for the total number correct (Ramos et al., 2009). A ceiling error occurs when an examiner stops a subtest before or after the criterion set in the manual has been reached. A recording error occurs when an examiner fails to write down identifying information or the examinee’s responses on the test protocol. A query error occurs when an examiner fails to query, or to query adequately, an answer that is incomplete or unclear; on the WISC-IV, failure to query was among the errors graduate students made most often (Loe et al., 2007).

Ethical Principles

The relevant APA ethical principles here are integrity and justice. Under the principle of integrity, psychologists seek to promote accuracy, honesty, and truthfulness in the science, teaching, and practice of psychology. In these activities, psychologists do not steal, cheat, or deceive, and they do not intentionally misrepresent facts. The principle of justice recognizes that fairness entitles all people to access to and benefit from the contributions of psychology, and to equal quality in the processes, procedures, and services that psychologists provide. Psychologists therefore exercise reasonable judgment and take precautions so that their potential biases, the boundaries of their competence, and the limits of their expertise do not lead to unjust practices (American Psychological Association [APA], 2017).

Issues Related to Test Scoring

Common Errors

The most common scoring errors are made in scoring individual items and in adding up the scores within a subtest. On the WISC-IV, the Vocabulary, Comprehension, and Similarities subtests show the most scoring errors (Loe et al., 2007).

Ethical Principles

The APA ethical principle most relevant to test scoring is fidelity and responsibility. This principle asks psychologists to build relationships of trust with the people they work with and to be aware of their professional and scientific responsibilities to society. Psychologists therefore uphold professional standards of conduct, accept responsibility for their own behavior, and are concerned about the ethical conduct of their colleagues. The principle also asks psychologists to give part of their professional time for little or no compensation (APA, 2017).

Issues Related to Test Interpretation

Common Errors

The most common errors in test interpretation are the fundamental attribution error, confirmation bias, and the omission of test interpretations. The fundamental attribution error occurs when a psychologist explains a person’s behavior by internal characteristics and overlooks external factors.

Ethical Principle

The APA ethical principle most relevant to test interpretation is respect for people’s rights and dignity. This principle recognizes people’s rights to privacy, confidentiality, and self-determination. When interpreting a test, psychologists respect these rights and the worth of every person, and they take special care to protect people whose vulnerabilities limit their ability to make decisions on their own. The principle also requires psychologists to work to eliminate the effect of bias on their work, whether the bias concerns an individual or a group (APA, 2017).

How Errors in Test Administration and Scoring Affect Test Validity

Errors in test administration and scoring threaten test validity because they keep practitioners from making sound diagnostic and intervention decisions for their clients. Conversely, by reducing administration and scoring errors in cognitive tests, psychologists can make more valid decisions about the people they assess (Loe et al., 2007; Ramos et al., 2009).

Editorial addition · not part of the original paperThe Five General Principles of the APA Ethics CodeThe paper ties each stage of testing to the general principles of the APA Ethics Code. These are the five, lettered as in the Code, each with what it asks of a psychologist and where the paper applies it.
  1. Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

    Benefit the people you work with and take care to do no harm. The paper applies it through the standard on avoiding harm, in assessment and in test fairness.

  2. Fidelity and Responsibility

    Build trust, accept responsibility for your own conduct and care about your colleagues’ conduct. The paper applies it to test scoring.

  3. Integrity

    Promote accuracy, honesty and truthfulness; do not deceive or misrepresent facts. The paper applies it to test administration.

  4. Justice

    Give everyone fair access to psychology’s benefits and equal quality of service, and keep bias and the limits of your competence from causing unfair practice. The paper applies it to test administration.

  5. Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity

    Respect privacy, confidentiality and self-determination, and work to remove bias from your work. The paper applies it to test interpretation.

Diagram by Writers Per Hour, summarising the paper above. The principles are those of the American Psychological Association, Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017).

APA Standards Indirectly Related to Psychological Assessment

Competence

The standards on competence require psychologists to provide services, teach, and conduct research with populations and in areas only within the boundaries of their competence, based on their education, training, supervised experience, consultation, study, or professional experience (APA, 2017, Standard 2.01).

Avoiding Harm

The standard on avoiding harm requires psychologists to take reasonable steps to avoid harming their clients, patients, research participants, and others with whom they work (APA, 2017, Standard 3.04).

Informed Consent

The standards on informed consent require psychologists to obtain the informed consent of the people involved before conducting research, assessment, therapy, or counseling, in language that is reasonably understandable to them (APA, 2017, Standards 3.10 and 9.03).

A Strategy to Reduce Errors in Psychological and Educational Tests

Psychologists should ensure that assessments are administered, scored, and interpreted by qualified professionals, so that fewer errors are made at each stage. Each assessment should go to a professional whose competence fits both the test and the client in question. Psychologists also do not promote the use of psychological assessment techniques by unqualified persons, except trainees working under appropriate supervision (APA, 2017, Standard 9.07), and they remain vigilant when administering and scoring tests.

Strategies to Reduce Violations of APA Assessment Standards

  • Psychologists should obtain informed consent from every client who undergoes a psychological assessment.
  • Psychologists should administer, score, and interpret every assessment carefully and accurately, as the test manual instructs.
  • Psychologists should make reasonable efforts to maintain the integrity and security of test materials at all times (APA, 2017, Standard 9.11).

Test Fairness

Issues Related to Test Bias and Fairness

How Test Norms and Standardization Can Lead to Biased Results for a Person

Norms that do not fit the person being tested increase the influence of extraneous variables, and the results of the assessment are then biased. Standardization, by contrast, reduces the influence of extraneous variables on a test. A lack of standardized procedures therefore produces unreliable and biased results and threatens the validity of the test (Gorard, 2010).

How Bias in Norms and Standardization May Affect the Validity of a Person’s Results

Standardization makes one person’s scores comparable with those of others. Bias in normative procedures arises, for example, when test takers tell psychologists what they believe is the appropriate answer rather than what is true of them. Both aspects affect the validity of a person’s results because they set the context in which an individual test is administered and interpreted (Domino & Domino, 2006).

Additional Sources of Test Bias

Test administration is a set of procedures developed for a testing program. When it is followed consistently, it minimizes measurement error and increases the probability of a fair, valid, and reliable assessment. Test score interpretation is the process of analyzing the scores on a test and translating them into meaningful statements about the test taker. Differential validity is the situation in which a test predicts an outcome for every group, but to different degrees (Domino & Domino, 2006). The format of the items can also shape the results: Currie and Chiramanee (2010) found that multiple-choice items measured knowledge of English language structure differently from the same items in an open-response format, whereas Bacon (2003) found multiple-choice and short-answer questions comparable in a marketing course.

Black-and-white photo of young soldiers in wool greatcoats sitting on a wooden floor against a wall, each writing on a board held on his knees; a campaign hat lies on the floor in the foreground.
Soldiers taking a group intelligence test, a predecessor of the Army Alpha, at Camp Lee, Virginia, in November 1917. The army’s group tests of this period were later criticized for bias against recent immigrants and recruits with little schooling.Photo: “American soldiers taking a predecessor of the Army Alpha – November 1917”, U.S. War Department, National Archives (111-SC-387), public domain. Resized. Image source

How Sources of Bias Can Affect the Validity of a Person’s Results

Sources of bias reduce the validity of a person’s results by adding to the examiner’s errors on cognitive tests. As a result, psychologists and practitioners make less valid diagnostic and intervention decisions for their clients (Loe et al., 2007).

APA Standards That Address Test Bias and Fairness

Competence

Psychologists should have expertise in the areas in which they provide services (APA, 2017, Standard 2.01).

Unfair Discrimination

Psychologists do not discriminate unfairly against individuals or groups when providing services (APA, 2017, Standard 3.01).

Avoiding Harm

Psychologists take reasonable steps to keep their clients safe from harm (APA, 2017, Standard 3.04).

Personal Problems and Conflicts

Psychologists refrain from providing services to a person or group when their own personal problems or conflicts are likely to keep them from performing competently (APA, 2017, Standard 2.06).

Steps to Reduce Violations of APA Ethical Principles Related to Test Bias and Fairness

The first step is to know the standards that apply to test bias and fairness.

Once familiar with these standards, psychologists should become aware of their own biases, so that the biases do not interfere with test scores. Psychologists should also keep building competence in their profession. Finally, psychologists should examine the test itself and check that its validity and reliability have been established for members of the population being tested, so that it gives accurate results for the people who take it (APA, 2017, Standard 9.02).

Technology and Psychological Assessment

Role of Technology in Psychological Assessment

Technology in the Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation of Psychological Tests

Technology has played an important role in improving psychological assessment. For instance, computer programs have been developed to test differences in cognitive processing in adolescents. Computer-scored tests have also become more accurate than hand-scored tests. Because a large share of testing errors is made by the person who scores the test, psychologists now use computers to administer, score, and interpret psychological tests; by entering results into a computer, they remove a source of human error (Scheu & Lawrence, 2013).

A beige desktop test-scoring machine labelled Scantron 888P+ OMR Test Scorer, with a slot for answer sheets across its top and a panel of key-marking instructions along the front edge.
An optical mark reader that scores answer sheets in a school. Machine scoring of this kind removes the adding-up errors that hand scoring is prone to, although it cannot catch errors in how a test was administered.Photo: “Scantron 888P+ machine” by Packer1028, CC0. Resized. Image source

Strengths and Drawbacks of Technology in Psychological Assessment

With technology, assessments are completed on time, and computers are cost-effective. Computerized reports are available soon after a test has been administered, which saves psychologists valuable professional time. Computers also offer more objective and less biased interpretations, because they reduce the likelihood of selective interpretation of the data, and they are less prone to human error, so scoring becomes more accurate.

However, technology has also made it easier for unqualified practitioners to misuse psychological tests. In addition, computer reports may not give the specific information about test takers that a diagnosis requires (Scheu & Lawrence, 2013).

Possible Ethical Issues in the Use of Technology in Psychological Assessment

A lack of awareness of computer-related issues can undermine clinicians’ ability to carry out computerized assessments ethically. Technology can also dehumanize the relationship between professional and client. Computerized assessments may lead to the use of computer test interpretations that have not been validated, and computers may allow unqualified practitioners to carry out psychological assessments (Scheu & Lawrence, 2013).

Ethical Rules on the Use of Technology in Psychological Assessment

Psychologists should ensure that the technology they use protects the privacy and confidentiality of their clients. Practitioners must ensure that every computer-assisted assessment is accurate and valid and that the technology used in testing does not harm their clients. Interpretations produced by computerized assessments should always protect the rights of the individual (APA, 2017, Standard 9.09).

Actions to Reduce Violations of APA Ethical Principles Related to Technology and Psychological Assessment

Psychologists should protect confidentiality, weighing any disclosure against their ethical responsibility to protect clients’ privacy. They should respect individuals’ autonomy by giving clients, from the start, the information they need to give informed consent. Psychologists must also understand what makes a multiple relationship: under the Ethics Code, they avoid relationships that could reasonably be expected to impair their professional performance or to harm the other person (APA, 2017, Standard 3.05; Nicholson, 2011).

Conclusion

In psychological testing, careful administration, scoring, and interpretation are essential to a valid and accurate result. Psychologists should therefore keep improving both their expertise and the technology they use, which helps them deliver accurate and reliable results. They also need to take care not to violate the APA ethical principles, since these principles are the foundation of a sound psychological assessment. Test bias and fairness matter because they determine the reliability, validity, and accuracy of tests. Technology has become vital to psychological assessment, but care must be taken to avoid computer interpretations that have not been validated.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  2. Bacon, D. R. (2003). Assessing learning outcomes: A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302250570
  3. Currie, M., & Chiramanee, T. (2010). The effect of the multiple-choice item format on the measurement of knowledge of language structure. Language Testing, 27(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209356790
  4. Domino, G., & Domino, M. L. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813757
  5. Gorard, S. (2010). Measuring is more than assigning numbers. In G. Walford, E. Tucker, & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of measurement (pp. 389–408). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268230.n20
  6. Loe, S. A., Kadlubek, R. M., & Marks, W. J. (2007). Administration and scoring errors on the WISC-IV among graduate student examiners. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906296505
  7. Nicholson, I. R. (2011). New technology, old issues: Demonstrating the relevance of the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists to the ever-sharper cutting edge of technology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 52(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024548
  8. Ramos, E., Alfonso, V. C., & Schermerhorn, S. M. (2009). Graduate students’ administration and scoring errors on the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20405
  9. Scheu, I. E., & Lawrence, T. (2013). Considerations of translating psychological tests into digital mediums: A case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.2.a

Rate This Sample

How useful was this example?

Your rating

Cite This Sample

Ethical Issues in Psychological and Educational Testing. (n.d.). Writers Per Hour. https://writersperhour.com/samples/research-paper/ethical-issues-in-psychological-testing

We'll ensure your essay is what you asked for

  • Have skilled academic writers complete your assignment.
  • Pay a fair rate for a writing that follows your guidelines.
  • Obtain a 100% unique essay ready before your due date.